Did Hillary Clinton take money from countries that kill gays women, gays poorly? Donald Trump continues to attack Hillary Clinton on everything from campaign spending to ISIS. At Trump's Phoenix rally last month, he accused Clinton of taking money from countries that have a poor record with women and gay people. “Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave vast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays,” Trump wrote in a from country that post.
Donald Trump called Hillary Clinton's inaction over Haiti in the debate this week a "disgrace" and described the foundation as a "criminal enterprise", with countries like Saudi Arabia giving it $25m. During Hillary Clinton 's tenure as Secretary of State, a number of individuals, organizations, and countries allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation either before, or while, pursuing interests through ordinary channels with the U.S.
State Department. [1][2] Judicial Watch, a clinton foundation donation in ongoing lawsuits pertaining to Clinton, alleged that email communications, obtained via FOIA. Sponsored Content by Taboola. He called her a "world-class liar". Past Republican candidates have found success attacking their opponents on their perceived strengthsexternal - a path Mr Trump appears to be following here.
That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. Effectiveness: Pulling in die-hard Sanders supporters may be a tough task for Mr Trump, but if he can capitalise on the sentiments that fuelled the Vermont senator's "revolution", he could find similar success. Sign up for the Headlines Newsletter and receive up to date information. But political candidates cannot accept donations from foreign governments.
So Democrats are forced to jettison all the good-government principles they previously claimed to believe and instead are now advocating the crux of the right-wing case against campaign finance reform: that large donations from vested factions are not inherently corrupting of politics or politicians. Hillary Clinton wants to bring in people who believe women should be enslaved and gays put to death.
Enter your email to keep reading for free.
Search for:. Justin Caffier - July Wednesday's speech was his most significant effort to date to regain his equilibrium and shift focus to his opponent's record. All rights reserved. Possible inappropriate relations with wealthy foreign officials and businesses - even if they don't amount to criminality - could prove fertile ground for Mr Trump in the general election, although at some point he may have to explain why he, too, was a Clinton Foundation donor.
Contact the author: Glenn Greenwald glenn. By Anthony Zurcher. In Citizens UnitedJustice John Paul Stevens wrote a scathing dissent on exactly this point, one that Democrats once cheered: So if you want to defend the millions of dollars that went from tyrannical regimes to the Clinton Foundation as some sort of wily, pragmatic means of doing good work, go right ahead.
This story was originally published on Wednesday, November 23, at a. After his widely panned speech on immigration and national security last week following the Orlando shooting, Mr Trump was more delicate in his handling of the issue on Wednesday. Jul 13, PM. He said she gave favourable trade deals and made business arrangements in exchange for lucrative speaking fees for her husband, allowed uranium tranfers to Russia in return for millions of dollars directed to the Clinton Foundation and accepted millions from mid-east countries that oppress gays and women.
This is not a paywall. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. But — just as is true of their resurrecting a Cold War clinton foundation donation from countries that killed gays and its smear tactics against their critics — the benefits derived from this tactic should not obscure how toxic it is and how enduring its consequences will likely be.
She messed up the Middle East. The accusations of Clinton culpability in the Benghazi attack will be music to conservative ears, but have been roundly dismissed by US military and government officials involved in the immediate response. She's a job-killer. Report a typo.
Copyright ©elmsole.pages.dev 2025